There are, at the moment, several PSRs (PHP Standard Recommendations) involving HTTP:
- PSR-7: HTTP messages. These are the Request, Response, and Uri interfaces.
- PSR-17: HTTP message factories. These are the interfaces for “a thing that creates PSR-7 messages.”
- PSR-18: HTTP clients. These are the interfaces for sending out a PSR-7 request to an HTTP server, and getting a PSR-7 response in return.
- PSR-15: HTTP handlers. These are interfaces for adding “middleware” layers in a server-side framework. The middleware sits “between” application code and the actual Web server, and can process, forward, and/or modify requests and responses.
I will avoid PSR-15 from here on; the inspiration for this post was dealing with the client side of the stack, not the server.
As for the rest, the the two ending in 7 are related: PSR-17 is about creating PSR-7 objects, without the caller knowing the specific PSR-7 objects. However, it’s a kind of recursive problem: how does the caller know the specific PSR-17 object to use?
There's also some confusion caused by having “Guzzle” potentially refer to multiple packages. There’s the
guzzlehttp/guzzle HTTP client, and there’s a separate
guzzlehttp/psr7 HTTP message implementation. Unrelated packages may use
guzzle in their name, but not be immediately clear on which exact package they work with.
php-http/guzzle7-adapteris related to the client.
http-interop/http-factory-guzzleprovides PSR-17 factories for the Guzzle PSR-7 classes, and has nothing to do with the client.
Additionally, whether these packages are needed has changed somewhat over time.
guzzlehttp/psr7 version 2 has PSR-17 support built in, and
guzzlehttp/guzzle version 7 is compatible with PSR-18. Previous major versions of these packages lacked those features.
The problem of finding PSR-compatible objects is solved by an important non-PSR library from the HTTPlug (HTTP plug) project:
php-http/discovery (and its documentation.)
- It lets code ask for a concrete class by interface, and Discovery takes care of finding which class is available, constructing it, and returning it.
- It includes its own list of PSR-17 factories and PSR-18 clients, and can return those directly, where applicable. When Guzzle 7 is installed, Discovery (of a recent enough version) can return the actual
\GuzzleHttp\Clientwhen asked to find a PSR-18 client.
- It has additional interfaces for defining and finding asynchronous HTTP clients, where code is not required to wait for the response before processing continues.
At its most basic, Discovery can find PSR-17 factories and PSR-18 HTTP clients. These would be loaded through the
Psr18ClientDiscovery classes. For the more advanced features like asynchronous clients, the additional adapter packages are required.
For example, to use Guzzle 7 asynchronously,
php-http/guzzle7-adapter is required. At that point, it can be loaded using
HttpAsyncClientDiscovery::find(). This method then returns an adapter class, which implements php-http's asynchronous client interface, and passes the actual work to Guzzle.
In any case, library code itself would only require
php-http/discovery in its composer.json file; a project making use of the library would need to choose the concrete implementation to use in its composer.json file.
An Important Caveat
Discovery happens at run time. Since Discovery supports a lot of ways to find a number of packages, it doesn't depend on them all, and it doesn't even have a hard dependency on, say, the PSR-17 interfaces themselves. This means that Composer MAY install packages, even though requirements aren't fully met to make all of them usable.
To be sure the whole thing will actually work in practice, it's important to make some simple, safe HTTP request. In my case, I use the Mailgun client to fetch recent log events.
When code using Discovery fails, the error message may suggest installing “one of the packages” from a list, and providing a link to Packagist. That link may include the name of a package that is installed. Why doesn’t it work? It’s probably the version that is the culprit. If
guzzlehttp/psr7 version 1 is installed, but not
http-interop/http-factory-guzzle, then the error is raised because there is genuinely no PSR-17 implementation available with the installed versions. However, the
guzzlehttp/psr7 package will be shown on Packagist as providing the necessary support, because the latest version does, indeed, support PSR-17.
Things Have Changed a Bit Over Time
As noted above, prior to widespread support for PSR-17 and PSR-18, using the
php-http adapters was crucial for having a functioning stack. So was installing
http-interop/http-factory-guzzle to get a PSR-17 adapter for the
guzzlehttp/psr7 version 1 code.
For code relying only on PSR-17 and PSR-18, and using the specific Discovery classes for those PSRs, the latest Guzzle components should not need any other packages installed to work.
However, things can be different, if there is another library in use that causes the older version of
guzzlehttp/psr7 to be used. This happens for me: the AWS SDK for PHP specifically depends on
guzzlehttp/psr7 version 1, so I need to include
http-interop/http-factory-guzzle as well, for Mailgun to coexist with it.
One Last Time
If you’re writing a library, use and depend on
If you’re writing an application, you must also depend on specific components for Discovery to find, such as
guzzlehttp/guzzle. Depending on how the libraries you are using fit together, you may also need
http-interop/http-factory-guzzle for an older
guzzlehttp/psr7 version, or a package like
php-http/guzzle7-adapter if a simple PSR-18 client isn’t suitable.
There are alternatives to Guzzle, but since my projects are frequently AWS-based, and their SDK depends on Guzzle directly, that’s the one I end up having experience with. I want all of the libraries to share dependencies, where possible.
Post a Comment